Donald Trump vs. Adolf Hitler

Adolf Hitler was a man from the small bourgeoisie in Austria, his father was a government employee. Hitler was heavily abused by his father as the Swiss psychoanalyst Dr. Alice Miller has analyzed in one of her books, and his childhood was one big trauma. Hitler was never successful in making any money, for years living as a poor artist and clochard before he got the idea to enter politics. Newer research found that Hitler was close to mental retardation with an IQ around or under 80. Hitler was a loner and never had any significant relationships, neither with men nor with women. His ‘love’ with Eva Braun was never ending in a consummated marriage as Hitler was sexually impotent.

Eva Anna Paula Hitler (née Braun; 6 February 1912–30 April 1945) was the longtime companion of Adolf Hitler and, for less than 40 hours, his wife.

Donald John Trump was born into a wealthy family, his father having been a very successful real estate developer in NYC. He was a constructive while strict personality and gave Donald a good education and the chance to get into real estate developing early in life, around the age of 10.

Donald proved to be a ‘real estate genius’ in the admiring words of his father and early succeeded in building a brand and an empire. He was unusally successful and turned out to be very sturdy psychologically when in 1989 his ventures turned into disaster and he was at the brink of bankruptcy. Yet he held through and convinced the banks to give him another chance which they did, trusting his hard-working mentality, his word, and also, admittedly, his brilliant showmanship.

From that time on, nothing could stop Trump to become a world-famous billionaire who set buildings, towers and golf courses in the world that have gained the appreciation of other developers, the rich elite, comments from designers of renown, and the world at large.

I have read all of Trump’s books, and more importantly, the books written by George H. Ross, Esq., his long-term lawyer and friend, who was able to put some sort of objective focus on him, while not hiding his admiration for his smart in developing real estate.

Trump was depicted by Ross as a ‘master of the deal’ and more importantly, a deal maker, not a deal breaker. What does that mean? It means first of all that when Trump makes a deal, as hard as he can be on the conditions, he will stick to it and stay behind it, and carry it through. He has gained an aura of respectability in this quality of his, not only in the flashy NYC real estate world but also around the world and regions that many other Western real estate developers know little about, such as the Middle East and Russia.

And I repeat myself when stating once again that today business principles reign politics more than any time before in human history, except perhaps the governance of ancient Rome and ancient Venice. In all our major conflicts in the world, there were no solutions for decades, think only of the Israel-Palestine conflict. And why? Because there were no politicians involved both locally and internationally who have a track-record as deal-makers and who are master negotiators as are Trump and his son-in-law, Jared Kushner.

Donald Trump, after all the profile studies I did about him, clearly turns out to have the profile of a social-minded business person who is able to build lasting relationships both professionally and privately, and who achieves his goals by acting by and large within the rule of law. He certainly does not have the profile of a psychopath, dictator, political tyrant or mass-murderer-in-spe. He has the profile of a showman and a smart deal-maker, also of a versatile negotiator, while his day-to-day attitude can be erratic, unpredictable, and brusk, sometimes even harsh!

I have studied fascism over many years starting in the 1980s, in the framework of my studies of international relations and politics. Fascist leaders all come from the little bourgeoisie and all of them were poor when they were young. Include here Mussolini, Franco, Mao Tse Tung, Stalin, Pinochet, Bokassa, or any of the more recent vintage exemplars of the same stature. They were and are all bad in business, unable to negotiate because of their faulty personalities and their overly narcissistic egos, but also unable to build anything of value such a business empire. And they have poor social lives, unable to build valuable long-terms relations with people in all fields of life.

What is more, they had all bad intimacy relations and were not fully sexually potent with women, while Trump has a track record here that is flawless as a sexually healthy and active heterosexual man who has a strong attraction for the other sex, but is also actively desired by the other sex. In the words of his wife Melania:

— Many women come here to present their profile and services, and hope to get filed as service providers. What they more want from my husband I don’t know, but it’s a fact that they are lining up for it. (Quoted from memory).

By the way, sexology and neuroscience fully affirm today that men who are fully sexually engaged with women, and who attract women in turn, have a low violence potential. See the research on the roots of violence conducted by authorities such as Dr. James W. Prescott, Ashley Montagu, Bowlby, and already back in the 1930s, Dr. Wilhelm Reich.

This being said, I have never heard of a billionaire, sexually straight and respectfully raised by a caring father who suddenly turned into a psychopath and holocaust organizer. It’s not part of human history, because it’s not part of human psychology! And journalists who put up such comparisons only show what poor journalism they have learnt and that, besides, they have no idea of human psychology, nor of human history!

When people, especially and notoriously in America, even when they are journalists, equate Hitler and Trump, they are simply ignorant about the roots and structure of fascism, and the mental setup and personality profile of fascist rulers since time immemorial.

What I was exposing here are psychological facts, not in any way a ‘political’ opinion. Modern journalism is pretty much unbridled guesswork more than anything these days, and has little psychological understanding for the realities of leaders, good or bad.

I fully agree with your perception that the media engage in what may be called a negative obsession with Trump that has reached colossal dimensions. But as I know Trump, he will turn all of this to his favor, as he always used to say that negative publicity is better than no publicity at all. And he is not the originator of that saying of course, for it’s a truth that keeps all of the best public relation firms around the globe prospering and alive!

Italy Referendum

Have foreseen it of course, more than 30 years ago. All is going to a landslide fascism movement in Europe, social division, and civil war. You bet, I knew it coming since so long.

In France, the Far Right will be in power, in Italy now as well, in Austria and Hungary already, soon in Holland, but Merkel in Germany will resist and remain a balancing force. I would say the destiny of Europe is on Merkel’s shoulders which is no easy task and will immortalize her. She will really be the sentinel of European Values for the next years to come—I mean, until every little stupid frog will be a Fascist in the name of God and The Nation!

The right-wing forces get all their support now from the Election of Donald Trump while I would not even think that the real estate magnate has intended this landslide for Fascism. His character is not at all compatible with the character of Adolf Hitler. We have here two very different personality profiles.

Why Did Trump Win?

Die dümmsten Kälber wählen ihre Schlächter selber.
—German Proverb

Preludio Satirico

First of all, see my previous posts about Donald Trump:

Where are Trump’s Trumps?

Niall Ferguson: It’s Over For Trump

If the subject was not so serious, I would say I start with a fun note. But anyway, Deepak Chopra was deadly serious when he voiced this in two interviews back in June this year.

‘He thinks with his penis!’
—Deepak Chopra on Donald Trump

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2Eee8AL4WNI

‘Incapable for being centered, intuitive, no insight, no intuition, no creativity, no vision …’
—Deepak Chopra, ibid.

First, let me comment on the commenter, for in this following interview, Chopra said basically the same but the interviewer was more critical:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4L_EsA5C0Tg

The interviewer got him namely to admit that he is not balanced and not from the top of his wisdom when calling Trump ’emotionally retarded like a 3-year old.’ He also got him to admit that he is enraged. So? The great wisdom teacher from California is enraged about a simple politician?

So, the great Chopra threw a mini-tantrum but justifying it aptly with:
—Trump represents our shadow, he gets all of us into the worst person we can possibly be …

Wait a moment, a meditation teacher and head of the new age movement in America is getting enraged over a a billionaire who plays politician? If he had said, ‘concerned’ I would certainly agree, but enraged? I had my doubts since long about Chopra’s integrity but after this blunder, I know this guy is not your new age demi-god.

Adagio Reflectivo

I read all of Trump’s books. While possibly not written by himself, but certainly inspired by facts that are true and also inspired by his personality and the stories others in the NYC and American real estate world have reported.

A great influence in his life had his father, preceding his son as a very successful real estate investor and George Ross, Esq. who was and is much more than just his lawyer, himself also a big player in NYC real estate.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/George_H._Ross

After a heavy loss with real estate in Thailand, 2011 to 2013, I ordered all of Trump’s and Ross’s books and for the first time knew and got practical advice how to buy, manage, sell and promote real estate.

What had I done in Thailand? I bought two pool villas in best locations via the Internet, and while I had been looking at them, this was just a formality for previous to coming to Thailand, I had sent the money already to my agent. And this agent was dishonest. Without knowing I bought one house without furniture, and the other had a major plumbing problem. I needed more than two years to sell the houses again and lost the equivalent of one, like I got two and got only back.

The first thing I learnt from Trump was that he when considering and evaluating one property, he also considers and analyzes 99 others, and only after this intense scrutiny he decides to buy. And of course, he buys the one that fares best in the analysis. This is only one of many points that Trump considers, not even to talk about his brilliant way to deal with NYC zoning laws which allowed him to build Trump Tower, a project at at the start looked absolutely doomed.

Now let me take up Chopra’s comments again:

‘Incapable for being centered, intuitive, no insight, no intuition, no creativity, no vision …’
—Deepak Chopra, ibid.

Not true. In all matters real restate, Trump has over many years proven to be extremely creative, especially with NYC zoning laws and how to get around them, insightful, visionary, and focused always to reach his goals and get to the point to break through seemingly impossible and impossibly complex situations.

He also is extremely tough but fair with architects and contractors and learnt a great deal already as a youngster from his father in this respect. He is overall very respected in the business world as a great visionary real estate developer, a man who is certainly tough but ultimately respects his partners in a deal.

Most of these books I have read twice, just to tell you I am as deadly serious about the good sides of Trump as Chopra is about his bad traits. But I think that Chopra most of all has disqualified himself by these interviews as the great ‘spiritual’ leader of the new age movement, showing in all detail how vindictive, explicitly negative and partisan he is to unbalanced views.

Allegro Impetuoso

The next reason is deadly simple. Hillary Clinton was not strong enough to prove that the American political system is okay. Most voters go for the ‘unknown’ just as people go for the unknown when searching for new sexual options. In other words, this was a novelty election, for that was what voters were looking for. That means this time American voters were serious about seeking novelty, new solutions, unusual and daring ideas, and simply a whole new political milieu altogether.

Clinton was not able to distance herself enough from the ‘Clinton Clan’ and if you don’t know what it’s about, please watch infowars.com as I did over the last weeks.

It is that many Americans are fedup generally with the US Administration and that may be why many voters voted for Trump as the ‘unknown’ factor, to bring about a change, even for the worse, but a change anyway. See what Arnold Schwarzenegger said about this, which I find a very balanced assessment:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CMbx9tW1b7I

It was also said by Ron Paul in an interview with Alex Jones that you can find on inforwars.com, while I do not agree with Ron Paul when he said it wouldn’t matter who would win because matters will remain ‘anyway pretty much the same.’ I don’t think so, not at all!

Next, Alex Jones has started an investigation what the Clinton Foundation did in Haiti and it’s deadly serious. This report was just started to unfold and is not finalized yet but the announcement of their outrageous deeds has simmered through already.

Alex Jones was from the start clearly for Trump but interestingly enough did not believe himself that he would win. He thought the press was manipulated, election process tampered with, and other things but his passion was for Trump to win. Why?

Look at another total dissenter from public opinion and the mainstream media: Julian Assange.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Julian_Assange

Assange left no doubt that he considers Clinton the worst choice if ever there is any choice which in this case was limited to just two options it seems: Clinton or Trump. Of course, Assange never said he was pro Trump, but he clearly said that he was anti-Clinton. That was enough in my opinion to give a decisive impetus to undecided voters from the underground that may not have been subject to all the pro-Clinton polls.

Intermezzo Universale

Third, the one who will be happy with this result is Vladimir Putin, less happy will be Angela Merkel, but Trump was wise enough to turn down his bad temper timely before becoming president, changing his rhetoric from negative to positive about Merkel. This showed me about a week ago that he was serious to being elected, not just hopeful.

http://www.nydailynews.com/news/politics/russia-celebrates-trump-nears-election-day-victory-article-1.2865220

http://www.itv.com/news/update/2016-11-09/merkel-government-weary-of-voice-of-anger-trump/

Andante Spirituale

Now, let us have finally a spiritual look on the matter.

I am a member of the Theosophical Society Adyar, in Germany, since 1997, and have until back in the 1980s read and analyzed the writings of Helena P. Blavatsky, Annie Besant, Charles Webster Leadbeater, George Gurdjieff, and J. Krishnamurti.

I have studied Angelology since 1985, when I woke up unharmed from a suicide attempt, and was meeting with a major angel researcher in Cyprus, Stylianos Atteshlis, more popular under his short name Daskalos, back in 1995.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stylianos_Atteshlis

Unfortunately I had been two days late as he had just passed away at the time of my arrival, and I was meeting with his wife, Panayiota who gave me a very enlightening book about the work of angels published in Germany and entitled ‘Das Symbol des Lebens.’
https://bible.org/article/angelology-doctrine-angels

The Karma of America is one of the worst since Roman times. It may be a replication actually of the pattern that was set in morphic resonance ever since. See Rupert Sheldrake, A New Science of Life, 2009:

http://www.sheldrake.org/books-by-rupert-sheldrake/a-new-science-of-life-morphic-resonance

http://www.sheldrake.org/research/morphic-resonance/introduction

I was really amazed to learn how angels regulate the atmosphere through introducing ‘purging’ events such as thunderstorms, hurricanes and earthquakes.

The same applies for our political reality and all the devastations that karma brings to war and destruction.

No, to get to my point, I believe that the angelic world has facilitated this absolutely crazy election result for a very simple and rational reason. It was for saving time to get to the point. The point is the absolute reversal of values that I predict in all my books and that inter alia Fritjof Capra has brilliantly presented in his own books.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fritjof_Capra

So we are talking about an acceleration of the timing, a boosting of quantum reality. What does this mean in practice?

Prestissimo Infernale

The Trump reality will bring such an incoherence to systems all over the world that this will lead to an increase of incoherence and a decrease of coherence in all systems. This, in turn, will lead to conflict on all forums of international dialogue and in what I may call ‘stuckness’ or ‘stagnation.’ See more about coherence, what does it mean and how it is related to leadership?

See From Chaos to Coherence: The Power to Change Performance, by Doc Childre & Bruce Cryer, Boulder Creek, CA: Planetary Publishing, 2004.

https://www.amazon.com/Chaos-Coherence-Power-Change-Performance/dp/1879052466

https://blissviews.wordpress.com/2016/09/25/from-chaos-to-coherence/
(Book Review)

The market reaction, internationally, shows clearly that the psychological effects of this election are negative.

Lao Tzu’s teaching is very clear about the evolution of humanity, as is the I Ching. It is clearly not a linear process but a nonlinear process as all life progresses in a nonlinear fashion.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nonlinear_system

Please see my books:
https://www.scribd.com/document/268679791/The-Leadership-I-Ching

https://www.scribd.com/document/251082973/The-Better-Life-Transforming-Yourself-From-Inside-Out

https://www.scribd.com/doc/269255075/Dao-De-Ging
(German)

https://www.scribd.com/document/270197544/Das-Dao-der-Staatsfuhrung-und-Strategie-Huainanse
(German)

Coda

Finally, have a look at this:

https://www.theguardian.com/film/2016/may/20/noam-chomsky-on-donald-trump-almost-a-death-knell-for-the-human-species

Larry Summers Sees a Grim Future Under a Trump Presidency

http://www.humansandnature.org/the-ethics-of-globalism-nationalism-and-patriotism

http://bit.ly/2g02f6V

http://www.sltrib.com/opinion/3975057-155/summers-trump-is-a-much-worse

The candidacy of Donald Trump has prompted a vigorous public debate over whether or not Trump is flirting with fascism. Some analysts suggest his political dance partner is leading him to the tune of right-wing populism. Other analysts say Trump’s marriage to fascism already has been consummated. Either way, Trump is stomping on the dance floor of democracy in a way that could collapse it into splinters. It’s a “scary moment for those of us who seek to defend civil rights, civil liberties, and democracy itself,” warns political analyst Noam Chomsky.

http://www.politicalresearch.org/2015/12/12/trumping-democracy-right-wing-populism-fascism-and-the-case-for-action/

Respecting Syria’s Sovereignty

Fact is that the highest military officer of the United States has pronounced himself clearly against Clinton’s idea of a no-fly zone over Syria which she said she would immediately enact after being president, while back in 2013 she has said about the same idea:
—A no-fly zone over Syria would mean the death of uncountable Syrians.

It is not the first time that Clinton changed her opinions so drastically, for as we all know, her husband did the same.

So Trump has just repeated what this high military officer said which in summary is:
—A no-fly zone over Syria implicitly compels the Russians to back off in Syria for protecting the Assad regime. This would clearly be a cause of WW3.

If we follow what Putin said over the last 2 years or so, this is absolutely correct and realistic as an assessment.

Also see that President Obama voiced criticism at Clinton and a no-fly zone fully identifying with the statement of the military commander as a realistic assessment of today’s political reality.

As always, the solution is easy but it’s habitual thinking, ingrained habits and grandiloquous strategies that prevent easy solution from manifesting in political life around the globe.

The United States and Nato need to declare a change of strategy in Syria to make a compromise with Russia that will have positive consequences for all parties involved. They have to back down with the intention to oust the Assad regime. That’s the only and quite easy-to-do concession they have to make in order to gain Russia’s collaboration, and it’s so much the more appealing to me as it is in full conformity with international law. Why?

To oust a regime or a sovereign state is always critical under Article II, 2 United Nations Charter for it represents an interference in the internal affairs of a foreign sovereign state. Humanitarian considerations are on a different plane, they are not under presently valid international law a cause for ousting a regime without violating the basic foundation of international law which is the principle of sovereignty.

I have clearly stated in my books that sovereignty is an outdated and peace-impeaching paradigm but it is unfortunately still our current world order.

So as this is still the basic principle of international law, Nato was from the start wrong with the idea of ousting the Assad regime and Russia was from the start right in wanting to not interfere—but they are of course not right in terms of the humanitarian agenda when it goes to practically defend that regime. Here is where Putin, too, overstepped the line.

Thus, as both parties could admit their mistakes, a basic line of cooperation is to make out on which Trump and Putin could agree. And honestly, my intuition tells me they WILL agree on that if against all the odds Trump is elected.

Niall Ferguson: It’s Over For Trump

http://www.bloomberg.com/news/videos/2016-10-20/niall-ferguson-it-s-over-for-trump

See what I predicted back in August 13:

Where are Trump’s Trumps?

WW3 ‘Imminent’ and ‘Inevitable’

Tensions between Washington and Moscow have plunged to Cold War levels in recent weeks after US ended talks on how to approach the war in Syria.

Since the breakdown between the global superpowers, the Kremlin has vowed to shoot down any American fighter planes that attack President Bashar al-Assad’s forces in Syria.

And now Turkey’s deputy prime minister Numan Kurtulmus has warned: “If this proxy war continues, after this, let me be clear, America and Russia will come to a point of war.”

http://www.express.co.uk/news/world/722283/Turkey-World-War-Three-inevitable-nuclear-US-Russia-Syria-conflict-Vladimir-Putin

See also:

http://www.express.co.uk/news/world/722203/US-Russia-Putin-WW3-nuclear-war-vladimir-putin

http://www.express.co.uk/news/world/721603/US-nuclear-attack-warning-upgraded-DEFCON-3-Vladimir-Putin-Russia-WW3

http://www.morningnewsusa.com/ww3-alert-russians-evacuating-to-nuclear-bunkers-23113033.html

http://www.anonews.co/china-ww3/

An Anticipated Invasion

http://uatoday.tv/politics/full-scale-attack-on-ukraine-to-begin-in-the-next-few-weeks-russian-expert-736957.html

If this happens, it will be the official start of WW3.

By the way, this was predicted by a high-ranking American military officer, months ago. He put it in these terms:

We are not sure where Putin will attack, but we are sure he will use the interim to the Presidential Elections in the United States for gaining more territory through a surprise attack, namely when the public in the United States is wary of war and focused upon the outcome of the elections. This will then put the new American President in front of a fait accompli.

(Quoted from Memory)

The EU Apple Ruling

http://www.cnbc.com/2016/08/30/confused-by-the-eu-apple-ruling-read-this.html

http://www.apple.com/ie/customer-letter/

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/worldviews/wp/2016/08/30/how-the-e-u-s-ruling-on-apple-explains-why-brexit-happened/

This is precisely the kind of stories that has over the years shown me the crooked nature of the EU Commission, the executive organ of the EU. While the Parliament may have some positive function, it has been the Commission that largely upset people, and that thinks ‘administration’ instead of ‘innovation.’

But beyond that and more in detail, first of all Ireland is one of the most corporate-friendly countries in Europe with a very reasonable taxation system. This is why many companies establish their European headquarters there. The corporate taxes are way lower than in Germany or France.

I think Apple should go for litigation in this case. It is absolutely unconstitutional to apply laws retroactively if these laws ask the citizen to pay something, be it only one dollar. As this is the nature of tax laws, they cannot be applied retroactively.

The whole construct of a ‘deal’ between Apple and the Irish government sounds really like a fabricated story. To say that even to non-professionals, it sounds completely unrealistic, and is an insult to the Ireish government! It should be opposed to as such by the Irish government, for it sounds like an accusation of corruption!

In addition, the EU cannot make laws nor can it change national laws because of the principle of national sovereignty. The EU can only make so-called ‘directions’ which are laws on the EU level but these laws do not function as laws within the member states. They function simply as incentives to the respective governments to make laws accordingly—but the member states have no obligation to follow these directions.

The sovereignty the member states have given to the EU is described in much detail in the EEG Treaty of 1957 and its addenda. Beyond that limited range of ‘adjunct sovereignty’ the EU has no general sovereignty. All the sovereignty it has is a ‘derived’ one, one that was granted to it by its constitution (in the sense of the EEG Treaty for a real Constitution in the sense of the term was an illusion fostered by some politicians, but was never enacted because of lacking consensus).

Thus from the information provided in this letter it seems clear to me that the EU Commission arrogates itself a sovereignty that it never had. Besides, it tries to interfere here in the internal national interests of a member state (Ireland) which it has no right to do. Third, it tries to enact or reform tax laws retroactively which is unconstitutional.

Wow. Ireland must be thrilled to be collecting all that money.

Not exactly. The Irish government has said it will appeal the EU ruling, saying the bureaucrats in Brussels have no business telling Dublin how much they should tax companies.

Tax rates are set by individual EU members, not by the European Commission. So Ireland is essentially telling the EU to mind its own business.

http://www.cnbc.com/2016/08/30/confused-by-the-eu-apple-ruling-read-this.html

As explained, it’s a clear sovereignty issue and I hope that these companies win the law suits against the EU Commission. It is time that the rules are set straight. The EU has a big dream of being a ‘European Government.’ That was indeed the initial idea but this idea was never realized because of lacking consensus between the EU members. I think time has run out for such a dream.

In addition, war and civil war are looming in Europe which will throw the member states back on minding their own business, and national interests. The call for more sovereignty is very clearly on the agenda already, which is a backward-scroll for the entire integration process.

The EU will lose its power then for as I pointed out, the member states are not obligated in any way to follow the EU directions as they do not have the power of ‘law’ within the member states. In other words, the entire ‘EU Business’ depends on the willingness of the member states to follow the EU directions. So, the EU can be blocked simply by ‘status quo’ thinking practiced by the member states. If directions are no more followed, the EU is like a car running in N gear …

A Brilliant Political Analyst

You all know Vladimir Putin as a leader, a political figure. Some of you may also know that he started his career as a KGB agent at a very young age.

For those of you who are critical about him, please watch this documentary first:

Vladimir Putin

Vladimir Putin

But have you ever wondered about him as a political analyst? He is that, too, and very potently so. No American president nor any leader from Europe ever have talked in these detailed and strikingly honest terms about balance of powers, war or peace.

I do not hide it from you, I am a Putin fan, but not like Trump is a Putin fan. I am a Putin fan for entirely different reasons, being an international lawyer.

Did you know that Putin has studied international law? Did you know that Donald Trump’s only [but truly great] expertise is real estate? To whom would you go for your political concerns, Putin or Trump?

For me, the answer is clear, I read all of Trump’s books for becoming a better real estate investor, and would consult Putin for any prediction of war or peace in 2017.

Weimar, Hitler, and 2016


A factually accurate report that I welcome, for I have studied not only law and international relations, but also took a special course about the Resistance Movements Against Hitler during WW2.

I have never met one single person, except the teacher of that course,  who could explain the phenomenon Hitler to me, including my own family. So I researched for many years until I found tidbits of truth that I voiced here and there, always meeting fierce resistance, especially from Germans.

Either people are fascinated by his rhetoric or they block off completely saying it was a ‘German’ problem (which it was not at all), or they blame the Weimar Republic—which is not entirely wrong but also not entirely right. Of course, Hitler profited of the political mistakes that this socialist regime committed, but that cannot explain all of his evil success in Europe and the World at large.

Let me get to the point quickly for I do not intend to waste your precious time. What you need to understand now is that you got a coalition in place, Turkey and Russia, whose goals are unworthy enough to be listed as destroying democracy as we know it. It is sold to you right now as a trade alliance but that is just the beginning. It will be a full blown political and military alliance that will oppose Nato—yes, despite the fact that Turkey is a member of Nato. But see only what will happen over the next months. I predict that by the end of this year, Turkey has got a clear distance to Nato and Nato has got a clear distance to Turkey.

Already by the news today, Nato, under American command, is shifting nukes from shelters in Turkey to Romania, and this is only a tiny detail of what could be called the ‘new strategy.’ Trust has been rendered very thin by Turkey’s absolutist claims and the purge of the country after the coup.

The mix we get in the media is honestly confusing. What is clear is that Turkey is in a state of ongoing chaos where separatist movements plan and execute deadly attacks on police and military forces, while most of the time unfortunately civilians are the victims.

Here are my predictions:

  1. The Turkey-Russia Alliance will be a fortress against the West, based on a coalition of extremism, also religious extremism (Islam and Orthodoxy) against the liberal-minded Roman Catholic Church that is the base layer of Western democracy.
  2. The Turkey-Russia Alliance will be fueled by extremist Islamic movements and there will be a pseudo-war against ISIS for in truth, both Turkey and Russia are going to use these extremist forces for their profit (not officially so, of course).
  3. The Turkey-Russia Alliance will fuel resentment against the West, Western values, and Western culture, increasingly so, including democratic values, and both countries will show on a daily level how they envisage humanity to be guided by propaganda—just as Hitler did.
  4. Extremist and populist movements in Europe will be fascinated by these strong ideological statements and try to implement their strategies in their anti-EU political statements. We will face a lot of support for totally irrational and totally separatist movements in Europe, from 2017, and and even now emerging.
  5. WW3 will start in 2017 with either an invasion of Ukraine or Crimea by Russia, else a false flag operation, and a totally debilitating response of the United States, a country that all over recent history has shown to not understand the dynamics in Europe, nor in the Middle East.